Triptans Enhance Anti-CGRP Treatment Response

Posted on June 20 2025, By: Cerebral Torque

This content is sponsored by

Triptans Enhance Anti-CGRP Treatment Response

Large prospective study finds habitual triptan users show significantly better response to CGRP monoclonal antibodies
Study Published: Journal of Neurology, 2025

Study Overview

A study published in the Journal of Neurology has shown that migraine patients who habitually use triptans have a significantly better response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies compared to those who don't use triptans. This prospective cohort study followed 336 patients for 12 months, providing valuable insights for optimizing migraine treatment strategies.

336
Total Patients
Tracked for 12 months across two Italian headache centers
61.6%
Triptan Users
207 patients were habitual triptan users during the study
89.9%
Chronic Migraine
Most participants had a chronic migraine diagnosis

Findings

Primary Results

Patients who habitually used triptans showed consistently better outcomes across all measured parameters during anti-CGRP treatment:

  • Lower monthly headache days throughout the entire 12-month treatment period
  • Better response rates at both early (month 1) and long-term (month 12) timepoints
  • Reduced analgesic consumption compared to non-triptan users
  • Lower disability scores as measured by MIDAS questionnaire

Detailed Analgesic Use Findings

Beyond headache frequency, triptan users showed significant reductions in overall medication consumption:

69%
Reduction in Analgesics
Triptan users averaged significantly fewer analgesics per month by study end
63%
Fewer Medication Days
Days requiring any analgesic use were consistently lower in triptan users

This reduction in rescue medication use suggests that the combination therapy not only reduced headache frequency but also the severity and duration of breakthrough attacks.

Response Rate Comparisons

Response Category Triptan Users Non-Triptan Users Statistical Significance
≥50% Reduction (Month 1) 42.0% 27.1% p = 0.013
≥50% Reduction (Month 12) 55.6% 38.0% p = 0.024
≥75% Reduction (Month 1) 16.4% 7.7% p = 0.030
≤25% Reduction (Non-responders) 36.2% 49.6% p = 0.008

Understanding the Science

Why Triptans and Anti-CGRP Work Together

The study found a synergy between triptans and anti-CGRP treatments:

  • Complementary mechanisms: Triptans work presynaptically to inhibit CGRP release, while anti-CGRP mAbs work postsynaptically to block CGRP action
  • Common pathway: Both medications target the same trigeminovascular system implicated in migraine
  • Enhanced effect: The combination may provide more complete CGRP pathway modulation

Duration and Timeline of Enhanced Response

The benefits of combination therapy were both immediate and sustained throughout the study:

  • Early benefits: Significant differences emerged as early as month 1, with triptan users showing 42% vs 27% response rates
  • Sustained improvement: Benefits were maintained throughout the entire 12-month period
  • Peak differences: Most pronounced advantages occurred in months 3-12 of treatment
  • Long-term superiority: By month 12, the response gap actually widened (55.6% vs 38% showing ≥50% improvement)
  • Lower discontinuation: Triptan users were significantly less likely to stop treatment (26.1% vs 45% discontinued by month 12)
"This study showed greater effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAb in habitual triptans users, possibly due to a common and/or synergistic action." - Study Authors

Patient Groups

Group Definitions

TRIPTANS Group (207 patients): Patients who used at least one triptan per month in the 6 months before starting anti-CGRP treatment and continued triptan use during the study.

NO-TRIPTANS Group (129 patients): Patients who did not use triptans in the 6 months prior to anti-CGRP treatment and during the study period. This included patients with contraindications, prior triptan failure, or those who had never used triptans.

Study Protocol Details

Measurement Methods

  • Primary endpoint: Monthly headache days (MHDs) collected monthly via headache diaries
  • Secondary measures: Absolute number of analgesics per month, days with analgesic use, HIT-6 scores (monthly), and MIDAS disability scores (quarterly)
  • Response categories: ≤25% reduction (non-responders), ≥50% reduction (responders), ≥75% reduction (super-responders)
  • Follow-up period: 12 months with monthly assessments
  • Anti-CGRP medications: Erenumab (42.6%), galcanezumab (40.8%), and fremanezumab (16.7%)

Baseline Characteristics

Interestingly, the non-triptan users actually started with more severe disease:

  • Higher baseline headache days: 24.7 vs 21.8 days per month (p<0.001)
  • Greater disability: Higher HIT-6 scores indicating more severe impact
  • Higher medication overuse/adaptation: 82.1% of triptan users vs 69% of non-users had medication overuse
  • Similar demographics: No significant differences in age, sex, or disease duration

Despite starting with more severe symptoms, the non-triptan group still showed less improvement, making the findings even more significant.

Safety and Tolerability

Combination Safety Profile

The study found reassuring safety data for combining triptans with anti-CGRP medications:

  • No additional safety concerns: No new or unexpected adverse events were reported from combination therapy
  • Lower discontinuation rates: Triptan users were actually less likely to stop anti-CGRP treatment due to side effects or lack of efficacy
  • Better treatment persistence: Only 26.1% of triptan users discontinued vs 45% of non-users by month 12
  • Maintained tolerability: The combination did not appear to increase side effect burden
Study Limitations on Safety

Important note: While this study showed no additional safety concerns, it was not specifically designed as a safety study. The researchers focused on effectiveness rather than comprehensive safety analysis, so longer-term safety data for combination therapy is still needed.

Clinical Implications

For Healthcare Providers

  • Predictive value: Previous triptan response can help predict anti-CGRP treatment success
  • Treatment optimization: Patients already responding to triptans may be ideal candidates for anti-CGRP therapy
  • Personalized care: Treatment decisions can be better tailored based on triptan response history
For Patients

If you respond well to triptans, this study suggests you may be more likely to have a positive response to anti-CGRP medications. However, this doesn't mean non-triptan users won't benefit as many still showed significant improvement.

Future Research Directions

The researchers note several important areas for future investigation:

  • Episodic migraine studies: Validating findings in patients with less frequent attacks
  • Primary care validation: Testing results in broader patient populations
  • Standardized triptan response measures: Using validated criteria like 2-hour pain freedom
  • Mechanism studies: Better understanding the biological basis for the synergy
  • Optimal combination strategies: Determining best practices for combining therapies
  • Long-term safety studies: Comprehensive safety analysis of combination therapy over extended periods
"The response to triptans, in association with other predictive factors, can be useful in clinical practice to advise patients and physicians about the chances of efficacy of treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs." - Study Conclusion

Study Citation: Vollono, C., Romozzi, M., Munafò, A., Vigani, G., De Cesaris, F., Calabresi, P., & Iannone, L.F. (2025). Influence of triptans use on anti-CGRP mAbs response: a prospective, cohort study. Journal of Neurology, 272, 468.

Access Full Study

This summary is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with your healthcare provider for personalized treatment recommendations.